Skip to main content

MetaTrader 4 (MT4) prop firms 2026

MetaTrader 4 survives in prop trading for one concrete reason: thousands of expert advisors, custom indicators and proven session systems exist only in MQL4, and they run unchanged on an MT4 evaluation account. Availability has narrowed sharply, though. Licensing pressure on the MetaTrader white labels serving prop firms pushed much of the industry toward MT5, cTrader, DXtrade and in-house web platforms, and several companies now keep MT4 as a legacy option rather than a supported flagship.

This page lists the firms still offering MT4 access, prioritising those where that access is stable and documented, where payouts are verified and where the rulebook explicitly permits automation. Always check the platform attached to the exact programme, since MT4 is sometimes limited to selected account types or regions.

Verified on 4 firms ranked

Our ranking

MT4 Prop Firms: Where MetaTrader 4 Still Works 2026
# Firm Score Entry price Profit split First payout View profile
1 €79 90 % 14 days View profile
2 $59.99 95 % 5 days View profile
3 95 % View profile
4 $49 80 % 14 days View profile

Detailed analysis

1

FTMO

Forex / CFD · Crypto · Stocks

Coming in at number 1, FTMO has been operating since 2015 and scores 88/100 on our scale. Entry starts at €79 for a 1-phase evaluation. The risk envelope is a static drawdown capped at 10 %, with 3 % allowed per day. Funded traders keep 90 % of profits, with a first withdrawal available after 14 days. Notable freedoms: no time limit, expert advisors allowed, news trading allowed. Available on mt4, mt5, ctrader, dxtrade, tradingview.

Founded in Prague in 2015, FTMO reports more than $450 million paid to traders and closed its acquisition of broker OANDA in December 2025. The 2-Step challenge, static drawdown and no deadline, remains its core product, with fees fully refunded on the first payout. Price is the weak spot, and it rose again in 2026.

2

FundedNext

Forex / CFD · Futures · Crypto

Ranked 2 on this list, FundedNext has been operating since 2022 and scores 85/100 on our scale. Entry starts at $59.99 for a 2-phase evaluation. The risk envelope is a static drawdown capped at 10 %, with 5 % allowed per day. Funded traders keep 95 % of profits, with a first withdrawal available after 5 days. Notable freedoms: no time limit, no consistency rule, expert advisors allowed. Available on mt4, mt5, ctrader, match-trader.

On the forex and CFD side, FundedNext runs just two routes: Stellar 1-Step (10% target, 6% max loss) and Stellar 2-Step (8% then 5%, 10% max loss). Both use static drawdown, carry no deadline and come with refundable fees. Pricing is on the high side, and the headline 95% split needs a paid option — the contractual base is 80%.

3

Hola Prime

Forex / CFD · Futures

In third place, Hola Prime has been operating since 2024 and scores 75/100 on our scale. The risk envelope is a trailing (end of day) drawdown capped at 6 %, with 3 % allowed per day. Funded traders keep 95 % of profits. Notable freedoms: no time limit. Available on mt4, mt5, ctrader, match-trader, dxtrade.

Hola Prime, founded in mid-2024 in Hong Kong, sells speed: withdrawal requests processed within an hour, a payout cadence you choose yourself, and a profit split running from 65 % to 95 % depending on that choice. It is the only firm in this batch whose Trustpilot rating is still live (4.5/5 across 3,475 reviews), but it publishes no prices at all.

4

The Trading Pit

Forex / CFD · Futures · Stocks

In 4th place, The Trading Pit has been operating since 2021 and scores 59/100 on our scale. Entry starts at $49 for a 1-phase evaluation. The risk envelope is a static drawdown capped at 4 %, with 2 % allowed per day. Funded traders keep 80 % of profits, with a first withdrawal available after 14 days. Notable freedoms: no time limit, no consistency rule, expert advisors allowed. Available on mt4, mt5, ctrader, tradovate, rithmic, quantower.

Liechtenstein-based since 2021, The Trading Pit offers a rare multi-asset range — CFDs, futures and equities across six platforms. Its risk rulebook is among the clearest around. But a wave of account invalidations in 2026 and a suspended Trustpilot rating lead us to classify it as under watch.

Why this ranking

Why MT4 availability keeps shrinking

MetaTrader 4 is no longer actively developed: nine timeframes, a single-threaded tester, no native order book, and an instrument universe that in practice stops at forex and a handful of CFDs. The real cause of its retreat, though, is commercial. Tighter licensing conditions applied to the white labels serving prop firms pushed much of the sector toward MT5, cTrader, DXtrade and proprietary web platforms. A firm advertising MT4 today may quietly migrate a few months from now.

That instability matters at purchase time. Look for what the rulebook says about a platform change mid-evaluation: is the account transferred, reset, extended, refunded? Silence on that question is itself a data point, and worth weighing before you commit to an evaluation that runs for weeks.

What to check before paying for an MT4 challenge

Three technical details end more MT4 evaluations than bad entries do.

Server time comes first. Session-based systems and the daily loss calculation both depend on the server’s GMT offset, which differs between brokers and shifts at daylight-saving changeovers. A system calibrated on another offset will not behave identically.

Symbol naming comes second. A suffix appended to currency pairs is enough to stop an expert advisor from locating the instrument, or to distort its position-size calculation.

Licensing comes third. Most commercial EAs are locked to an account number, and moving to a funded account produces a new one, sometimes meaning another licence to buy. Around those, the usual checks still apply: hedging, partial closes, maximum lot size per symbol, and the treatment of positions held over news and weekends.

Where MT4 still makes sense

The natural user is the long-standing algorithmic trader with a tested MQL4 portfolio and custom indicators they have no intention of rewriting. The arithmetic is simple: as long as porting costs more than the comfort of a modern platform, staying on MT4 is rational. For a discretionary multi-asset trader, or for anyone building a toolkit from scratch today, the ecosystem is contracting too quickly to bet on. In that situation, the sensible move is to pass the evaluation on a platform that will still be supported in two years.

Frequently asked questions

Do prop firms still offer MT4?
Yes, but the choice is narrow. After licensing terms tightened for the brokers serving prop trading, most firms moved to MT5 or to web platforms. MT4 survives at a minority of companies, sometimes only on selected programmes or account sizes. Isolating those firms is exactly what this ranking is built to do.
Will my MQL4 expert advisor work on the funded account?
Technically yes, provided the firm keeps MT4 after you pass, which is not guaranteed: some evaluate on one platform and fund on another. Also check your robot's licence, usually bound to a single account number, and the broker's symbol naming, which often differs from the one used in your backtests.
MT4 or MT5 for a prop firm challenge?
MT5 if you are starting fresh: more instruments, multi-threaded backtesting, a language still maintained, and far broader availability across firms. MT4 only if your system already exists in MQL4 and rewriting it would cost more than the convenience gained. The two platforms share neither code nor account files.
Can a symbol suffix break my strategy?
Yes, and it is a common failure. Brokers frequently label instruments with their own suffix. An expert advisor hard-coded to an exact name will either find nothing or trade the wrong instrument. Checking the market watch takes a minute and avoids losing the first days of a time-limited evaluation.

Other rankings