Top Prop Firm compares proprietary trading firms — companies that sell a paid evaluation and, if you pass, give you access to a funded account. The market is opaque by construction: rules change without notice, firms appear and disappear within a year, and most comparison sites rank by commission rate without saying so.
We built the opposite. Every figure comes from a firm's own website and carries the date it was checked. Every score is computed by a script from those figures, using weights published on the methodology page. And every field we could not verify stays visibly empty rather than being filled with a plausible guess.
Prices, profit targets, drawdown thresholds, splits and payout delays are read from the firm’s own site, recorded in a dated data file, and only then written about. The editorial text is produced from the data, never the reverse — which makes it structurally impossible to publish a figure that does not exist in our records.
When a value cannot be verified, the cell shows a dash flagged “not verified”. Copying it from another comparison site would propagate their error; estimating it would invent one. Some of our profiles look sparser than the competition for exactly this reason.
Scores are computed from published data by a script with published weights. There is no manual rating input and no sponsored position field. Changing a score would require changing a dated, sourced data point — which would show up in that firm’s public change history.
We are not a broker, a prop firm, or a financial intermediary. We hold no funds, execute no orders and take no part in your relationship with a firm. We do not sell signals, courses or mentoring, and we never will — every comparison site that has gone down that route ended up recommending whatever it was also selling.
Analyses and reviews are published under a single editorial byline, Camille Berthier — a name given to a consistent editorial standard, not a natural person. That page explains the choice and the production chain behind every piece.