Camille Berthier

How this content is produced

Every analysis published under this byline follows the same production chain, and it is described here deliberately rather than left implicit.

Data first. The figures — pricing, profit targets, drawdown thresholds, profit splits, payout delays — are read off the official websites of the firms concerned and recorded in dated data profiles. The editorial text is written afterwards, from those profiles. That order is not incidental: it makes it structurally impossible to publish a number that does not exist in the recorded data.

Gaps stay gaps. When a piece of information could not be verified against an official source, it is neither estimated nor copied from another comparison site. It is displayed as unverified, and the analysis draws no conclusion from it.

Scores are not written. They are computed by a script from the data profiles, using weights published on the methodology page. No rating is ever entered by hand, which means no editorial text can move a firm up or down.

Corrections are visible. A corrected data point appears in the change history of the firm concerned, with its date. A reader who reports a factual error can therefore check that it was actually dealt with.

Why a byline rather than a real name

The prop firm comparison space is full of invented expert biographies, generated portraits and author credits designed to simulate an authority that does not exist. We chose the opposite: a single name, owned as an editorial byline rather than as a person, with a published methodology in place of a résumé.

What backs the credibility of these analyses is not a biography, but the ability to trace every figure to its source and to recompute every score from public weights.