Skip to main content

Bulenox vs FundedNext: which prop firm is better in 2026?

On the 33 criteria we compare, the two firms end up level. The decision comes down to which constraint matters most to you: entry cost, drawdown model, or payout terms.

Verified on

Bulenox

Futures · Trustpilot 4.7/5

Bulenox is a futures-only firm run from Delaware since 2022. Accounts are sold as renewable monthly subscriptions, $145 to $325 for $25,000 to $150,000, payouts clear every Wednesday, and the first $10,000 goes entirely to the trader. It holds 4.7/5 across 1,761 Trustpilot reviews, but a 40% consistency rule gates withdrawals and drives recurring complaints.

Criteria won : 8 / 33

FundedNext

Forex / CFD · Futures · Crypto · Trustpilot 4.5/5

On the forex and CFD side, FundedNext runs just two routes: Stellar 1-Step (10% target, 6% max loss) and Stellar 2-Step (8% then 5%, 10% max loss). Both use static drawdown, carry no deadline and come with refundable fees. Pricing is on the high side, and the headline 95% split needs a paid option — the contractual base is 80%.

Criteria won : 8 / 33

Pricing at equal account size

Cheapest evaluation for a 100 K account.

Bulenox

$215

FundedNext

$549.99

Full comparison

Bulenox vs FundedNext (2026) — Full Comparison
Criterion Bulenox FundedNext
Trust
Score 81/100 85/100
Trustpilot 4.7/5 4.5/5
Founded 2022 2022
Headquarters US AE
Pricing
Entry price $145 $59.99
Price for a 100 K account $215 $549.99
Refundable fee Yes
Reset price $78
Account sizes 150 K 200 K
Rules
Steps 1 2
Profit target 6 % 8 %
Max daily loss 5 %
Max total drawdown 10 %
Drawdown type Hybrid Static
Time limit Unlimited Unlimited
Consistency rule No
Min trading days 0 5
Payouts
Profit split 90 % 80 %
Max profit split 100 % 95 %
First payout 10 days 5 days
Payout frequency hebdomadaire (traitement le mercredi) Stellar 1-Step : premier retrait apres 5 jours ouvres puis tous les 5 jours ouvres. Stellar 2-Step : premier retrait a 21 jours puis tous les 14 jours
Payout methods bank, wire, paypal, and wise
Scaling plan Yes
Max allocation 150 K 300 K
Trading
Platforms and instruments ninjatrader, rithmic, quantower mt4, mt5, ctrader, match-trader
Instruments futures fx, indices, metals, energy, crypto
Leverage 1:30 forex sur Stellar 1-Step (verifie sur le site officiel) ; 1:100 forex annonce sur Stellar 2-Step
News trading Yes
Weekend holding No
Expert Advisors Yes Yes
Copy trading Yes Restricted
Scalping Yes
Hedging

Choose Bulenox if…

  • You need a platform FundedNext does not offer: ninjatrader, rithmic, quantower.
  • You expect to stay funded long enough for the split to matter: 100 % against 95 % at FundedNext.
  • You want the shortest path to funding: 1 evaluation phase against 2 at FundedNext.

Choose FundedNext if…

  • Your budget is the binding constraint: the entry ticket starts at $59.99, below Bulenox.
  • You want a drawdown you can compute in your head: the limit is fixed on the starting balance and never moves as the account grows.
  • Cash flow matters to you: the first withdrawal comes after 5 days rather than 10.
  • You need a platform Bulenox does not offer: mt4, mt5, ctrader, match-trader.

Our analysis

Getting paid

Bulenox keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 10 days, then pays hebdomadaire (traitement le mercredi). FundedNext keeps 95 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 5 days, then pays Stellar 1-Step : premier retrait apres 5 jours ouvres puis tous les 5 jours ouvres. Stellar 2-Step : premier retrait a 21 jours puis tous les 14 jours. Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.

Tooling differences

Bulenox is the only one of the two to offer ninjatrader, rithmic, quantower. FundedNext covers mt4, mt5, ctrader, match-trader, which its rival does not. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.

How much history each firm has

On Trustpilot they sit at 4.7/5 and 4.5/5 respectively. Our trust pillar scores them 77/100 and 81/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.

The price question

FundedNext opens at $59.99 against $145 for Bulenox, a substantial gap on the smallest account. At the reference size of 100 K the comparison is $215 for Bulenox against $549.99 for FundedNext. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.

How the loss limit behaves

Bulenox applies a hybrid drawdown. FundedNext applies a static drawdown capped at 10 %, with a 5 % daily limit. This is the single most consequential difference between the two. A static drawdown is measured once, from the starting balance, and never moves; a trailing drawdown follows your equity upward, so a winning streak raises the floor you can no longer fall below. Intraday trailing is stricter still, because it tracks unrealised peaks reached inside the session — profit you never actually banked can permanently raise your loss threshold.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better between Bulenox and FundedNext?
The two firms split the 33 criteria almost evenly, so there is no objective winner. Pick the one whose drawdown model and payout cycle match how you actually trade.
Which of the two is cheaper?
FundedNext, with an entry price of $59.99 against $145. Check the reset price and whether the fee is refunded on the first payout before concluding — those two lines often reverse the ranking.
Which one has the more forgiving drawdown?
FundedNext, because a static or end-of-day trailing drawdown leaves more room than an intraday one, which tracks unrealised peaks reached during the session.
Which one offers the larger accounts?
FundedNext, up to 200 K against 150 K. Remember that a bigger account also means a bigger absolute drawdown to respect.
Can I run both at the same time?
Nothing prevents you from holding accounts at two different firms — many funded traders do, to spread the risk of a single firm changing its rules or delaying a payout. What is usually forbidden is mirroring the same trades across accounts, which most firms treat as copy trading and can void a payout. Check each firm's terms on that specific point.

Other comparisons