Skip to main content

Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips: which prop firm is better in 2026?

Across pricing, rules and payout terms, Funded Trading Plus takes the lead (5 against 4). FundingPips remains the cheaper way in and its drawdown model is the more forgiving of the two, so the choice is not automatic.

Verified on

A London firm founded in late 2021 and bought by Instant Funding in May 2026, Funded Trading Plus pays every 7 days on its 1-Step Express and Instant programs, with the split rising from 80 to 100% and scaling up to $5 million. The catch: intraday trailing drawdown on both, and a Trustpilot score the platform has pulled.

Criteria won : 5 / 33

FundingPips

Forex / CFD · Crypto · Trustpilot 4.5/5

FundingPips lets you choose the withdrawal rhythm and prices the split accordingly: 60% weekly, 80% biweekly, 90% on demand, 100% on a monthly cycle. Its four evaluation models keep static drawdown, with only the instant-funding Zero account switching to trailing. Against that, a Striking System closes a funded account on the fourth warning.

Criteria won : 4 / 33

Pricing at equal account size

Cheapest evaluation for a 100 K account.

Funded Trading Plus

$549

FundingPips

Closest size : 5 K — $29

Full comparison

Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips (2026) — Full Comparison
Criterion Funded Trading Plus FundingPips
Trust
Score 80/100 83/100
Trustpilot 4.5/5
Founded 2021 2022
Headquarters GB AE
Pricing
Entry price $89 $29
Price for a 100 K account $549
Refundable fee Yes No
Reset price
Account sizes 200 K 200 K
Rules
Steps 1 2
Profit target 10 % 6 %
Max daily loss 4 % 3 %
Max total drawdown 6 % 6 %
Drawdown type Trailing intraday Static
Time limit Unlimited Unlimited
Consistency rule
Min trading days 1
Payouts
Profit split 80 % 80 %
Max profit split 100 % 100 %
First payout 7 days
Payout frequency Tous les 7 jours sur 1-Step Express et Instant ; tous les 10 jours sur 2-Step Classic Cycle au choix : hebdomadaire (60 %), bi-hebdomadaire (80 %), a la demande (90 %) ou mensuel (100 %)
Payout methods crypto and rise
Scaling plan Yes
Max allocation 5 M
Trading
Platforms and instruments mt5, ctrader, dxtrade, match-trader mt5, ctrader, match-trader
Instruments fx, indices, metals, energy, crypto fx, indices, metals, energy, crypto
Leverage 1:30 sur 1-Step Express, 1:50 sur 2-Step Classic
News trading
Weekend holding Yes
Expert Advisors Yes
Copy trading Restricted Restricted
Scalping Yes
Hedging

Choose Funded Trading Plus if…

  • You want the shortest path to funding: 1 evaluation phase against 2 at FundingPips.
  • You need a platform FundingPips does not offer: dxtrade.

Choose FundingPips if…

  • You want a drawdown you can compute in your head: the limit is fixed on the starting balance and never moves as the account grows.
  • Your budget is the binding constraint: the entry ticket starts at $29, below Funded Trading Plus.

Our analysis

Where you actually trade

Funded Trading Plus is the only one of the two to offer dxtrade. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.

Track record

Funded Trading Plus has been running since 2021, 1 years longer than FundingPips. Our trust pillar scores them 74/100 and 81/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.

What you pay to start

FundingPips opens at $29 against $89 for Funded Trading Plus, a substantial gap on the smallest account. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.

Drawdown: the rule that decides

Funded Trading Plus applies a trailing intraday drawdown capped at 6 %, with a 4 % daily limit. FundingPips applies a static drawdown capped at 6 %, with a 3 % daily limit. This is the single most consequential difference between the two. A static drawdown is measured once, from the starting balance, and never moves; a trailing drawdown follows your equity upward, so a winning streak raises the floor you can no longer fall below. Intraday trailing is stricter still, because it tracks unrealised peaks reached inside the session — profit you never actually banked can permanently raise your loss threshold.

What reaches your account

Funded Trading Plus keeps 100 % of profits, then pays Tous les 7 jours sur 1-Step Express et Instant ; tous les 10 jours sur 2-Step Classic. FundingPips keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 7 days, then pays Cycle au choix : hebdomadaire (60 %), bi-hebdomadaire (80 %), a la demande (90 %) ou mensuel (100 %). Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better between Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips?
Funded Trading Plus wins 5 of the 33 criteria we compare, against 4 for FundingPips. That said, the ranking depends on what you weight: entry cost, drawdown model and payout speed do not point in the same direction for every trader.
Which of the two is cheaper?
FundingPips, with an entry price of $29 against $89. Check the reset price and whether the fee is refunded on the first payout before concluding — those two lines often reverse the ranking.
Which one has the more forgiving drawdown?
FundingPips, because a static or end-of-day trailing drawdown leaves more room than an intraday one, which tracks unrealised peaks reached during the session.
Which one offers the larger accounts?
Both cap the evaluation at 200 K. Beyond that, what differs is the scaling plan applied once you are funded.
Can I run both at the same time?
Nothing prevents you from holding accounts at two different firms — many funded traders do, to spread the risk of a single firm changing its rules or delaying a payout. What is usually forbidden is mirroring the same trades across accounts, which most firms treat as copy trading and can void a payout. Check each firm's terms on that specific point.

Other comparisons