Skip to main content
City Traders Imperium FundingPips Head to head · 33 criteria compared

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips: which prop firm is better in 2026?

FundingPips wins this comparison (5 against 2). City Traders Imperium stays relevant for traders whose priorities differ from the average.

Verified on
City Traders Imperium homepage: headline on eight years of paying out traders, $4M scaling and 100% profit share figures, Trustpilot and Google badges
City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium

Forex / CFD Trustpilot 4.2 / 5 (1,625 reviews)

City Traders Imperium has funded forex traders since 2018 through four routes — 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant Funding and Direct Funding — with no time limit and entry from $29. The profit split starts at 80% and can reach 100%, but the 1-Step allows only 5% trailing drawdown and every trade must carry a stop loss.

Criteria won: 2 / 33

FundingPips homepage: pale blue design, headline "Turn your trading skills into income", glass candlestick artwork, $301M and 3 million traders
FundingPips

FundingPips

Forex / CFD · Crypto Trustpilot 4.5 / 5 (67,127 reviews)

FundingPips lets you choose the withdrawal rhythm and prices the split accordingly: 60% weekly, 80% biweekly, 90% on demand, 100% on a monthly cycle. Its four evaluation models keep static drawdown, with only the instant-funding Zero account switching to trailing. Against that, a Striking System closes a funded account on the fourth warning.

Criteria won: 5 / 33

Pricing at equal account size

Cheapest evaluation for a 100 K account.

City Traders Imperium City Traders Imperium

$449

FundingPips FundingPips

—

Closest size: 5 K — $29

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips (2026) — Full Comparison
Full comparison City Traders Imperium City Traders Imperium FundingPips FundingPips
Trust
Score 83/100 83/100
Trustpilot 4.2/5 4.5/5 ✓
Founded 2018 ✓ 2022
Headquarters GB AE
Pricing
Entry price $29 $29
Price for a 100 K account $449 —
Refundable fee — No
Reset price — —
Account sizes 100 K 200 K ✓
Rules
Steps Instant funding ✓ 2
Profit target — 6 %
Max daily loss — 3 %
Max total drawdown 6 % 6 %
Drawdown type Trailing intraday Static ✓
Time limit Unlimited Unlimited
Consistency rule No —
Min trading days 5 1 ✓
Payouts
Profit split 80 % 80 %
Max profit split 100 % 100 %
First payout 7 days 7 days
Payout frequency Monthly at level 1, twice monthly at level 2, weekly at level 3; first withdrawal possible after 7 days Cycle of your choice: weekly (60%), bi-weekly (80%), on demand (90%) or monthly (100%)
Payout methods — —
Scaling plan Yes —
Max allocation 2 M —
Trading
Platforms and instruments mt5, match-trader mt5, ctrader, match-trader ✓
Instruments fx, indices, metals, energy, stocks fx, indices, metals, energy, crypto
Leverage 1:30 forex and indices on the 2-Step, 1:20 on Instant Funding, 1:10 indices and commodities, 1:2 crypto —
News trading Yes —
Weekend holding Yes —
Expert Advisors Yes —
Copy trading Restricted Restricted
Scalping Yes —
Hedging — —

City Traders Imperium Choose City Traders Imperium if…

  • You would rather skip the evaluation entirely and start on a funded account.

FundingPips Choose FundingPips if…

  • You want a drawdown you can compute in your head: the limit is fixed on the starting balance and never moves as the account grows.
  • You need a platform City Traders Imperium does not offer: ctrader.

Our analysis

Risk rules side by side

City Traders Imperium applies a trailing intraday drawdown capped at 6 %. FundingPips applies a static drawdown capped at 6 %, with a 3 % daily limit. This is the single most consequential difference between the two. A static drawdown is measured once, from the starting balance, and never moves; a trailing drawdown follows your equity upward, so a winning streak raises the floor you can no longer fall below. Intraday trailing is stricter still, because it tracks unrealised peaks reached inside the session — profit you never actually banked can permanently raise your loss threshold.

Payout terms compared

City Traders Imperium keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 7 days, then pays Monthly at level 1, twice monthly at level 2, weekly at level 3; first withdrawal possible after 7 days. FundingPips keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 7 days, then pays Cycle of your choice: weekly (60%), bi-weekly (80%), on demand (90%) or monthly (100%). Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.

Platforms and instruments

FundingPips covers ctrader, which its rival does not. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.

Trust and longevity

City Traders Imperium has been running since 2018, 4 years longer than FundingPips. On Trustpilot they sit at 4.2/5 and 4.5/5 respectively. Our trust pillar scores them 85/100 and 81/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.

Entry cost

Both firms open at $29. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.

Other comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is better between City Traders Imperium and FundingPips?
FundingPips wins 5 of the 33 criteria we compare, against 2 for City Traders Imperium. That said, the ranking depends on what you weight: entry cost, drawdown model and payout speed do not point in the same direction for every trader.
Which of the two is cheaper?
Both open at the same entry price, so the difference plays out on resets and on whether the fee is refunded.
Which one has the more forgiving drawdown?
FundingPips, because a static or end-of-day trailing drawdown leaves more room than an intraday one, which tracks unrealised peaks reached during the session.
Which one offers the larger accounts?
FundingPips, up to 200 K against 100 K. Remember that a bigger account also means a bigger absolute drawdown to respect.
Can I run both at the same time?
Nothing prevents you from holding accounts at two different firms — many funded traders do, to spread the risk of a single firm changing its rules or delaying a payout. What is usually forbidden is mirroring the same trades across accounts, which most firms treat as copy trading and can void a payout. Check each firm's terms on that specific point.

Discounts that are actually verified

No discount code is published without being checked on the firm’s own website. An unverified deal does not appear here.

See the discounts