Skip to main content
FundingPips Topstep Head to head · 33 criteria compared

FundingPips vs Topstep: which prop firm is better in 2026?

FundingPips wins this comparison (9 against 4). Topstep stays relevant for traders whose priorities differ from the average.

Verified on
FundingPips homepage: pale blue design, headline "Turn your trading skills into income", glass candlestick artwork, $301M and 3 million traders
FundingPips

FundingPips

Forex / CFD · Crypto Trustpilot 4.5 / 5 (67,127 reviews)

FundingPips lets you choose the withdrawal rhythm and prices the split accordingly: 60% weekly, 80% biweekly, 90% on demand, 100% on a monthly cycle. Its four evaluation models keep static drawdown, with only the instant-funding Zero account switching to trailing. Against that, a Striking System closes a funded account on the fourth warning.

Criteria won: 9 / 33

Topstep homepage: headline "Become a Funded Futures Trader" over a night photo of a skier, instant payouts promise and a Start Trading Now button
Topstep

Topstep

Futures Trustpilot 3.6 / 5 (14,680 reviews)

Founded in Chicago in 2012, Topstep is the oldest futures prop firm. It charges a monthly subscription rather than a one-off ticket, with a 6 % target and a trailing drawdown that locks once the starting balance is cleared. Its 90 % profit split and first withdrawal after five winning days are among the best in the segment.

Criteria won: 4 / 33

Pricing at equal account size

Cheapest evaluation for a 100 K account.

FundingPips FundingPips

—

Closest size: 5 K — $29

Topstep Topstep

$99

FundingPips vs Topstep (2026) — Full Comparison
Full comparison FundingPips FundingPips Topstep Topstep
Trust
Score 83/100 ✓ 77/100
Trustpilot 4.5/5 ✓ 3.6/5
Founded 2022 2012 ✓
Headquarters AE US
Pricing
Entry price $29 ✓ $49
Price for a 100 K account — $99
Refundable fee No No
Reset price — —
Account sizes 200 K ✓ 150 K
Rules
Steps 2 1 ✓
Profit target 6 % 6 %
Max daily loss 3 % —
Max total drawdown 6 % ✓ 4 %
Drawdown type Static ✓ Trailing (end of day)
Time limit Unlimited Unlimited
Consistency rule — 50
Min trading days 1 ✓ 2
Payouts
Profit split 80 % 90 % ✓
Max profit split 100 % ✓ 90 %
First payout 7 days 5 days ✓
Payout frequency Cycle of your choice: weekly (60%), bi-weekly (80%), on demand (90%) or monthly (100%) On request: Express Funded Standard after 5 winning days at $150+; Express Funded Consistency after 3 trading days with a 40% consistency target
Payout methods — wise and bank
Scaling plan — Yes
Max allocation — 150 K
Trading
Platforms and instruments mt5, ctrader, match-trader ninjatrader, tradovate, rithmic
Instruments fx, indices, metals, energy, crypto ✓ futures
Leverage — —
News trading — —
Weekend holding — No
Expert Advisors — —
Copy trading Restricted —
Scalping — —
Hedging — —

FundingPips Choose FundingPips if…

  • You expect to stay funded long enough for the split to matter: 100 % against 90 % at Topstep.
  • You need a platform Topstep does not offer: mt5, ctrader, match-trader.
  • Your budget is the binding constraint: the entry ticket starts at $29, below Topstep.
  • You want a drawdown you can compute in your head: the limit is fixed on the starting balance and never moves as the account grows.

Topstep Choose Topstep if…

  • You want the shortest path to funding: 1 evaluation phase against 2 at FundingPips.
  • You need a platform FundingPips does not offer: ninjatrader, tradovate, rithmic.
  • Cash flow matters to you: the first withdrawal comes after 5 days rather than 7.

Our analysis

Payout terms compared

FundingPips keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 7 days, then pays Cycle of your choice: weekly (60%), bi-weekly (80%), on demand (90%) or monthly (100%). Topstep keeps 90 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 5 days, then pays On request: Express Funded Standard after 5 winning days at $150+; Express Funded Consistency after 3 trading days with a 40% consistency target. Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.

Platforms and instruments

FundingPips is the only one of the two to offer mt5, ctrader, match-trader. Topstep covers ninjatrader, tradovate, rithmic, which its rival does not. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.

Trust and longevity

Topstep has been running since 2012, 10 years longer than FundingPips. On Trustpilot they sit at 4.5/5 and 3.6/5 respectively. Our trust pillar scores them 81/100 and 80/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.

Entry cost

FundingPips opens at $29 against $49 for Topstep, a substantial gap on the smallest account. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.

Risk rules side by side

FundingPips applies a static drawdown capped at 6 %, with a 3 % daily limit. Topstep applies a trailing (end of day) drawdown capped at 4 %. This is the single most consequential difference between the two. A static drawdown is measured once, from the starting balance, and never moves; a trailing drawdown follows your equity upward, so a winning streak raises the floor you can no longer fall below. Intraday trailing is stricter still, because it tracks unrealised peaks reached inside the session — profit you never actually banked can permanently raise your loss threshold.

Other comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is better between FundingPips and Topstep?
FundingPips wins 9 of the 33 criteria we compare, against 4 for Topstep. That said, the ranking depends on what you weight: entry cost, drawdown model and payout speed do not point in the same direction for every trader.
Which of the two is cheaper?
FundingPips, with an entry price of $29 against $49. Check the reset price and whether the fee is refunded on the first payout before concluding — those two lines often reverse the ranking.
Which one has the more forgiving drawdown?
FundingPips, because a static or end-of-day trailing drawdown leaves more room than an intraday one, which tracks unrealised peaks reached during the session.
Which one offers the larger accounts?
FundingPips, up to 200 K against 150 K. Remember that a bigger account also means a bigger absolute drawdown to respect.
Can I run both at the same time?
Nothing prevents you from holding accounts at two different firms — many funded traders do, to spread the risk of a single firm changing its rules or delaying a payout. What is usually forbidden is mirroring the same trades across accounts, which most firms treat as copy trading and can void a payout. Check each firm's terms on that specific point.

Discounts that are actually verified

No discount code is published without being checked on the firm’s own website. An unverified deal does not appear here.

See the discounts