Skip to main content

Bulenox vs Earn2Trade: which prop firm is better in 2026?

Bulenox wins this comparison (6 against 5). Earn2Trade stays relevant for traders whose priorities differ from the average.

Verified on

Bulenox

Futures · Trustpilot 4.7/5

Bulenox is a futures-only firm run from Delaware since 2022. Accounts are sold as renewable monthly subscriptions, $145 to $325 for $25,000 to $150,000, payouts clear every Wednesday, and the first $10,000 goes entirely to the trader. It holds 4.7/5 across 1,761 Trustpilot reviews, but a 40% consistency rule gates withdrawals and drives recurring complaints.

Criteria won : 6 / 33

Earn2Trade

Futures · Trustpilot 4.6/5

Earn2Trade does not fund traders itself: it is a US evaluation and education platform founded in 2016, with capital supplied by partner firms Helios, Appius and Kronos. Its TCP and Gauntlet Mini programs bill monthly, $150 to $550, cover CME futures only, cap the split at 80% and run a trailing EOD drawdown.

Criteria won : 5 / 33

Pricing at equal account size

Cheapest evaluation for a 100 K account.

Bulenox

$215

Earn2Trade

$315

Full comparison

Bulenox vs Earn2Trade (2026) — Full Comparison
Criterion Bulenox Earn2Trade
Trust
Score 81/100 79/100
Trustpilot 4.7/5 4.6/5
Founded 2022 2016
Headquarters US US
Pricing
Entry price $145 $150
Price for a 100 K account $215 $315
Refundable fee
Reset price $78
Account sizes 150 K 200 K
Rules
Steps 1 1
Profit target 6 %
Max daily loss 2.2 %
Max total drawdown
Drawdown type Hybrid Trailing (end of day)
Time limit Unlimited Unlimited
Consistency rule 30
Min trading days 0 0
Payouts
Profit split 90 % 80 %
Max profit split 100 % 80 %
First payout 10 days
Payout frequency hebdomadaire (traitement le mercredi) hebdomadaire
Payout methods bank, wire, paypal, and wise
Scaling plan Yes
Max allocation 150 K 200 K
Trading
Platforms and instruments ninjatrader, rithmic, quantower ninjatrader, tradovate, tradingview, rithmic
Instruments futures futures
Leverage
News trading Yes Yes
Weekend holding No
Expert Advisors Yes
Copy trading Yes
Scalping Yes
Hedging

Choose Bulenox if…

  • You expect to stay funded long enough for the split to matter: 100 % against 80 % at Earn2Trade.
  • You need a platform Earn2Trade does not offer: quantower.
  • Your budget is the binding constraint: the entry ticket starts at $145, below Earn2Trade.

Choose Earn2Trade if…

  • You need a platform Bulenox does not offer: tradovate, tradingview.
  • You are aiming for size: allocation scales up to 200 K.

Our analysis

Platforms and instruments

Bulenox is the only one of the two to offer quantower. Earn2Trade covers tradovate, tradingview, which its rival does not. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.

Trust and longevity

Earn2Trade has been running since 2016, 6 years longer than Bulenox. On Trustpilot they sit at 4.7/5 and 4.6/5 respectively. Our trust pillar scores them 77/100 and 94/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.

Entry cost

Bulenox opens at $145 against $150 for Earn2Trade, a moderate gap on the smallest account. At the reference size of 100 K the comparison is $215 for Bulenox against $315 for Earn2Trade. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.

Risk rules side by side

Bulenox applies a hybrid drawdown. Earn2Trade applies a trailing (end of day) drawdown, with a 2.2 % daily limit. This is the single most consequential difference between the two. A static drawdown is measured once, from the starting balance, and never moves; a trailing drawdown follows your equity upward, so a winning streak raises the floor you can no longer fall below. Intraday trailing is stricter still, because it tracks unrealised peaks reached inside the session — profit you never actually banked can permanently raise your loss threshold.

Payout terms compared

Bulenox keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 10 days, then pays hebdomadaire (traitement le mercredi). Earn2Trade keeps 80 % of profits, then pays hebdomadaire. Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better between Bulenox and Earn2Trade?
Bulenox wins 6 of the 33 criteria we compare, against 5 for Earn2Trade. That said, the ranking depends on what you weight: entry cost, drawdown model and payout speed do not point in the same direction for every trader.
Which of the two is cheaper?
Bulenox, with an entry price of $145 against $150. Check the reset price and whether the fee is refunded on the first payout before concluding — those two lines often reverse the ranking.
Which one has the more forgiving drawdown?
Earn2Trade, because a static or end-of-day trailing drawdown leaves more room than an intraday one, which tracks unrealised peaks reached during the session.
Which one offers the larger accounts?
Earn2Trade, up to 200 K against 150 K. Remember that a bigger account also means a bigger absolute drawdown to respect.
Can I run both at the same time?
Nothing prevents you from holding accounts at two different firms — many funded traders do, to spread the risk of a single firm changing its rules or delaying a payout. What is usually forbidden is mirroring the same trades across accounts, which most firms treat as copy trading and can void a payout. Check each firm's terms on that specific point.

Other comparisons