How the loss limit behaves
BrightFunded applies a static drawdown capped at 8 %, with a 4 % daily limit. FTMO applies a static drawdown capped at 10 %, with a 3 % daily limit. Both use the same model, so the difference plays out on the percentages rather than on the mechanism.
Getting paid
BrightFunded keeps 100 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 30 days, then pays First payment 30 days after the first trade, then every 2 weeks; weekly and bi-weekly add-ons available. FTMO keeps 90 % of profits, allows a first withdrawal after 14 days, then pays On demand from the 14th day after the first trade, then every 14 days. Payout frequency deserves as much attention as the split itself: a slightly lower share paid every two weeks compounds faster than a headline percentage locked behind a monthly cycle and a long first-withdrawal delay.
Tooling differences
FTMO covers mt4, tradingview, which its rival does not. Platform choice is not cosmetic: order execution, available order types and the reliability of your automation all depend on it, and switching mid-evaluation is rarely possible.
How much history each firm has
FTMO has been running since 2015, 8 years longer than BrightFunded. Our trust pillar scores them 66/100 and 97/100, which weighs age, corporate transparency and public payout evidence. In an industry with no financial regulator overseeing these evaluations, longevity and a verifiable payout history are the closest thing to a guarantee.
The price question
BrightFunded opens at €47 against €79 for FTMO, a substantial gap on the smallest account. At the reference size of 100 K the comparison is €477 for BrightFunded against €499 for FTMO. The headline fee is rarely the real cost, though: what matters is the price of a reset after a failed attempt, whether the fee comes back on the first payout, and whether an activation fee appears when you move to a funded account. Compare those three lines in the table above before deciding on price alone.